Home | Staff | Crew v Oakley: Understanding Testamentary Capacity and Will Revocation

Crew v Oakley: Understanding Testamentary Capacity and Will Revocation

December 6th 2024
 

Judgment Delivered: November 2024

The recent case of Crew v Oakley provides valuable insight into the legal principles surrounding Will revocation, testamentary capacity and the importance of professional guidelines in estate planning. This recent judgment addressed whether the Deceased, Ms Carry Keats, had the mental capacity to revoke her Will shortly before her death and highlights to complexities of such disputes.

Case Summary

Ms Carry Keats, aged 92, attempted to revoke her Will two weeks before her death by tearing it in half. The original Will left her estate to her cousins but Ms Keats wished for her assets to pass to her sister, Josephine Oakley, under the rules of intestacy. However, due to frailty, Ms Keats only had the strength to tear it part-way before looking to her solicitor to assist in completing the action.

When asked by her solicitor if she needed help completing the task, Ms Keats made eye contact with her and nodded, which the solicitor interpreted as clear authorisation. The solicitor said she had ‘no shadow of a doubt’ regarding her capacity and intention.  

Following her death, Ms Keats’ cousins challenged the revocation arguing she lacked the capacity to make such a decision.

Key Legal Findings

1. Revocation of the will

Deputy Master Linwood held that:

  1. Ms Keats intended to destroy the Will;
  2. She acted on her intention but had simply been too weak to complete the tear; and
  3. Her nod was sufficient form of authorisation for the solicitor to complete the destruction. Words were not required.   

Under the Wills Act 1837, a will can be revoked by “the burning, tearing, or otherwise destroying the same by the testator, or by some person in his presence and by his direction, with the intention of revoking the same”. The judge found that, “there was a positive communication and not mere acquiescence, as Carry looked at Mrs Webb and responded to her direct offer with a physical command or instruction reflecting her wish that Mrs Webb should actively assist her to complete the tearing in half of the will”. Case law was also followed.

2. Testamentary Capacity

The Court accepted expert evidence showing that Ms Keats had testamentary capacity at the time of revocation – testamentary capacity is specific to the time of the act and can fluctuate, especially for elderly or unwell individuals.

The Judge gave weight to the solicitor’s testimony which was supported by her contemporaneous notes. The solicitor had made a thorough record of attending to Ms Keats on her deathbed and had recorded that Ms Keats had had a sufficiently lucid interval at the time that she revoked her will.

The longstanding relationship between Ms Keats and her solicitor, combined with the solicitor’s experience in drafting Wills, further strengthened the credibility of that evidence.

This judgment emphasises the critical role that experienced solicitors play in complex situations such as Will revocation and assessment of testamentary capacity. If Ms Keats had not revoked her Will in the presence of her solicitor, the outcome may have been very different.

You can find a more in-depth consideration into the differences between solicitors and unregulated professionals such as Will Writers in our previous article here, offering guidance in making informed choices in estate planning.

Resolving Will Disputes

In his closing remarks, Deputy Master Linwood described the dispute over Ms Keats’ estate as an “unseemly scrabble” for assets. He urged parties to engage in realistic and effective negotiation to resolve similar matters without resorting to litigation.

At Cartmell Shepherd, our dedicated Wills and Inheritance Disputes Team focuses on delivering practical, balanced and thoughtful solutions. We combine empathy with expert legal insight to navigate sensitive matters effectively. Whether you need support challenging a Will or a Will revocation, or defending such a claim, our team offers the experienced guidance and advice necessary for achieving the best possible outcome.

If you are facing similar issues regarding Will or Inheritance Disputes, please contact Selina on 01228 516666 or click here to send her an email to send her an email.

Share on Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
Book your FREE 30 minute consultation now
This website uses cookies
This site uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience. We use necessary cookies to make sure that our website works. We’d also like to set analytics cookies that help us make improvements by measuring how you use the site. By clicking “Allow All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
These cookies are required for basic functionalities such as accessing secure areas of the website, remembering previous actions and facilitating the proper display of the website. Necessary cookies are often exempt from requiring user consent as they do not collect personal data and are crucial for the website to perform its core functions.
A “preferences” cookie is used to remember user preferences and settings on a website. These cookies enhance the user experience by allowing the website to remember choices such as language preferences, font size, layout customization, and other similar settings. Preference cookies are not strictly necessary for the basic functioning of the website but contribute to a more personalised and convenient browsing experience for users.
A “statistics” cookie typically refers to cookies that are used to collect anonymous data about how visitors interact with a website. These cookies help website owners understand how users navigate their site, which pages are most frequently visited, how long users spend on each page, and similar metrics. The data collected by statistics cookies is aggregated and anonymized, meaning it does not contain personally identifiable information (PII).
Marketing cookies are used to track user behaviour across websites, allowing advertisers to deliver targeted advertisements based on the user’s interests and preferences. These cookies collect data such as browsing history and interactions with ads to create user profiles. While essential for effective online advertising, obtaining user consent is crucial to comply with privacy regulations.