Home | News | High court rejects forged Will: lessons from Khatun v Hasan & Anor

High court rejects forged Will: lessons from Khatun v Hasan & Anor

August 5th 2025
 

On 1st July 2025 the High Court ruled in Khatun v Hasan & Anor [2025] EWHC 1658 (Ch), that a Will disinheriting a man’s only child was fraudulent.

Selina Gonzalez, Will and Inheritance Dispute Solicitor, explores the red flags in the Will which led to the court’s decision and how to ensure you get the best legal advice if you suspect will fraud.

Background to the case

The case was brought by Mrs Mosammat Shapna Khatun, whose father, Mr Monir Jaman Shaikh, passed away in April 2020. When he died, to her surprise, she discovered that her father’s Will had apparently disinherited her entirely, leaving his estate – including four properties and his solicitor’s practice – to Mr Shamin Hasan.

Challenging the Will

Mrs Khatun contested the will’s authenticity, alleging fraud by Mr Hasan. She told the court that she enjoyed had good relationship with her father and barely knew Mr Hasan, who claimed he had been ‘like a son or nephew’ to Mr Shaikh. However, Deputy High Court Judge Caroline Shea KC noted a ‘scant production of the kinds of materials that would evidence such a relationship.’

Red Flags

Several irregularities in the will raised suspicion:

  • Questions around the storage and drafting of the Will
  • No records of solicitor’s meeting with Mr Shaikh
  • Spelling errors in the Will
  • Inclusion of properties not owned by Mr Shaikh

The court heard evidence from both parties as well as various witnesses, including a handwriting expert who concluded there was ‘strong evidence’ to suggest that the signature on the Will was not Mr Shaikh’s, but likely forged by someone familiar with his handwriting.

Court’s decision: will declared invalid

The court ruled in favour of Mrs Khatun, stating that the circumstances cast serious doubt on the Will’s authenticity. In such cases, the burden of proof lies with the party asserting the Will’s validity i.e. Mr Shaikh. The judge said Mr Shaikh  had ‘failed to discharge the burden of proof’ and explain the disparities surrounding the Will.

Procedural pitfalls

Interestingly, the court also highlighted procedural failures in the case, despite both parties having legal representation – a reminder of the importance of specialist legal advice when disputing a Will.

What to do if you suspect Will fraud

Disputes over Wills are legally complex, highly emotional and stressful. If you suspect a Will is fraudulent or invalid, it’s crucial to seek advice from a specialist solicitor experienced in contentious probate.

Look for ACTAPS Membership

A helpful tip: search for a solicitor who is a member of the Association of Contentious Trust and Probate Specialists (ACTAPS) – the gold standard accreditation for solicitors working in this area. Our team includes two ACTAPS members and Selina is in the process of gaining her accreditation.

How We Can Help

Our dedicated Will and Inheritance Disputes Team can guide you through every step of your dispute with clarity, compassion, and precision.

For more information or to speak to a member of Cartmell Shepherd’s Will and Inheritance Disputes team get in touch via willclaims@cartmells.co.uk or www.willclaims.co.uk; or phone 01228 516 666.

Share on Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
Book your FREE 30 minute consultation now
This website uses cookies
This site uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience. We use necessary cookies to make sure that our website works. We’d also like to set analytics cookies that help us make improvements by measuring how you use the site. By clicking “Allow All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
These cookies are required for basic functionalities such as accessing secure areas of the website, remembering previous actions and facilitating the proper display of the website. Necessary cookies are often exempt from requiring user consent as they do not collect personal data and are crucial for the website to perform its core functions.
A “preferences” cookie is used to remember user preferences and settings on a website. These cookies enhance the user experience by allowing the website to remember choices such as language preferences, font size, layout customization, and other similar settings. Preference cookies are not strictly necessary for the basic functioning of the website but contribute to a more personalised and convenient browsing experience for users.
A “statistics” cookie typically refers to cookies that are used to collect anonymous data about how visitors interact with a website. These cookies help website owners understand how users navigate their site, which pages are most frequently visited, how long users spend on each page, and similar metrics. The data collected by statistics cookies is aggregated and anonymized, meaning it does not contain personally identifiable information (PII).
Marketing cookies are used to track user behaviour across websites, allowing advertisers to deliver targeted advertisements based on the user’s interests and preferences. These cookies collect data such as browsing history and interactions with ads to create user profiles. While essential for effective online advertising, obtaining user consent is crucial to comply with privacy regulations.